|
Gang Stalking
Gang stalking is a systemic form of control which seeks to destroy every aspect of a targeted individual's life. A notification is sent out to the community at large about the target, who is placed under surveillance and monitored.
Notifications go to apartment rentals, employers, stores the target visits and community services such as police.
Individuals can be flagged designating them as having a history of aggressive or inappropriate behavior. This notification system will follow the target if they move, change jobs, or travel. It lets the community believe that the target is a threat.
In many countries these community notifications might fall under community safety and health laws. While workers have the right to know about dangerous individuals, it is important to remember that this information cannot be indiscriminately distributed. Individuals are being flagged without their knowledge, unlike the public notification system used for convicted criminals. It seems that in some cases innocent individuals are being flagged as a means of personal retaliation, silencing, or controlling them.
Gang stalking is experienced by the targeted individual as psychological attack, intended to immobilise and destroy them over time. The covert methods used to harass, persecute, and falsely defame the targets often leave no evidence to incriminate the civilian spies.
It is similar to workplace mobbing, but takes place outside in the community. Many targeted individuals are flagged, harassed and placed under surveillance in this way for months or even years before they realize that they are being targeted by an organized protocol of harassment.
Psychological harassment of the target is designed to destroy them over years, to make them look crazy and leave them with no form of support. The individuals around the target carry out actions as they are instructed, perhaps without realizing that the operation is designed to destroy the target.
Worldwide programs of control and conformity have been used with equal success and lethality. Countries around the world are currently using a model of policing called Community Oriented Policing. Many targets report that their information is passed and shared between country borders, and that harassment continues even when they travel.
Gang Stalking is officially used as a means of investigating or monitoring individuals who have displayed inappropriate or violent behaviours. The real goal in some cases seems to be to isolate the target from all forms of support, so that the target can be set up in the future for arrest, institutionalisation, or forced suicide. Other goals of this harassment are to destroy the target's reputation and credibility, to make the target destitute, look crazy or unstable.
There are many names for this form of systemic control and harassment, such as Community Mobbing, Community Stalking, Stalking by Proxy, Organized Stalking, Cause Stalking, Multi-Stalking. They are all the same community notification harassment protocol.
Officially targets are being flagged and investigated for suspected, or reported behaviours. Unofficially the targets are chosen because of many other reasons. They can be chosen for political views, for whistle-blowing, for belonging to a dissident movement, because they asserted their rights at work, because they made the wrong enemy, or going against the interests of the state, a corporation or other organisation. Every time the target moves, the same information, lies, and slander will be spread out into the new community and the systemic monitoring and harassment will continue.
People from all walks of life are a part of this system, because once a target is flagged, their information is distributed to a wide range of people, organizations, and communities. Participation is not limited by race, age, class, economics, gender or political affiliation.
People that the targeted individual comes in contact with are given a warning. These community notifications started with good intentions. Workers and the community at large do have a right to be notified if they are going to encounter persons who are dangerous. Citizens want to be able to protect themselves and their communities, however these programs are also being used to falsely target innocent people.
Many do not understand or care that the end consequence of this flagging is to destroy a person. Many people in today's society are scared, they are willing to give up personal freedoms for a false sense of security, and if that means taking away the rights of another individual to accomplish this, they have no problem doing this.
There are many reasons that someone takes part in this.
A few of the most common techniques are listed below.
This blanket notification propagates the belief that there are more "predators" in the community than ever before, and fearful attitudes among members of the public are reinforced. A vicious cycle results: widespread notification leads to an increase in the community's fear of crime which, in turn, leads to more calls for notification.
These actions might seem harmless to informant citizens, but in reality the actions could be causing great psychological trauma for the target, eg. blocking the target's path, cutting or boxing them in on the road, saying or doing things to elicit a response from targets, e tc. It's like the death of a thousand paper cuts. One or two minor incidents will not cause any harm to the target, the intent is to wear the target down slowly.
"Ruling the community with an iron fist. "Savvy law enforcement types realized that under the community policing rubric, cops, community groups, local companies, private foundations, citizen informants and federal agencies could form alliances without causing public outcry." Covert Action Quarterly, summer 1997."
"You mean to tell me that it is legal for corporations from the private sector to team up with local law enforcement officials in efforts to spy on innocent members of our society? You also mean to tell me that the synthesis of law enforcement authority and the drive of for-profit companies operate under little to no guidelines or restrictions and it is unclear to whom they are responsible to?" ACLU Blog 1. If you know someone who is being targeted in this way please don’t go along with it. Don’t assume that the person is guilty or a bad person. Many innocent people are currently being targeted, and people are being told lies. This form of harassment is systemic and it's about state control and conformity. The express goal of this harassment is to destroy the individual over time. 2. If you are aware of someone being harassed in this way, direct them to websites that deal with gang stalking, or sites for targeted individuals. Knowledge is power. 3. You can suggest that your community newspapers print articles about targeted individuals or even an write an objective piece about gang stalking. 4. If you are a law maker, you can petition for changing the laws. Ensure targets who are flagged in this way have proper notification letting them know that they are flagged. Convicted criminals have this right, why not targets? Many of whom are innocent members of the public. Petition for better oversight of these programs. As it stands communities are getting away with serious human rights abuses, and complaints are not being heard. Authority figures such as the police in many cases are not taking the reports seriously due to the type of warning markers attached to a target's file. 5. If you are a lawyer our community needs lawyers who are skilled in helping targets access Freedom Of Information files. Lawyers who can help targets get their files reviewed, or corrected. Lawyers who can work with the existing privacy laws to limit who and where the targets information is disseminated to. We need human rights lawyers who can address the complaints of abuses that are happening to people listed or flagged in this manner. Illegal surveillance, illegal access of mail and electronic communications, and torture via electronic monitoring. 6. Mental health professionals can recognize that there is illegal harassment happening to individuals who are flagged, listed or have warning markers placed against their names. Community notifications can and do create paranoia within communities. This notification makes targets prime for harassment, and community mobbing.
They can objectively investigate the complaints, and become familiar with the electronic means of monitoring and harassment that are being used. Laws are just starting to catch up to the technology, eg. europe is considering a ban on the mosquito device, because it infringes on the human rights of children. 1. GmB Bailey, "Bridging The Gap." 2. Gloria Naylor. "1996" 3. Kristina Borjesson "Into the Buzzsaw" 4. Jim Redden "Snitch Culture" 5. Noa Davenport "Mobbing: Emotional Abuse in the American WorkPlace" 6. Ward Churchill, Jim Vander Wall "Cointelpro Papers" 7. Anna Funder "Stasiland" 8. Protectors of Privilege: Red Squads and Police Repression in Urban America 9. Victor Santoro "GASLIGHTING How To Drive Your Enemies Crazy" 10. Anthony Brina "Suburban Spies" 11. Stephen Knight "The Brotherhood" 12. Alex Constantine "The Covert War Against Rock" 13. Frank Donner "The Age of surveillance" 14. Niki F. Raapana "2020" 15. Dr. Andrew M. Lobaczewski. Political Ponerology: The science on the Nature of Evil. 16. Community Oriented Policing. A Systemic approach. |